In a world where iPhones dominate the premium space, the Vivo X200 FE comes in hot—offering better hardware, a lower price, and practical features that even the iPhone 16 skips. But can it actually outshine Apple’s compact powerhouse? Let’s break down the full comparison.
Design & Build: Inspired, Yet Better?
The Vivo X200 FE takes visual cues from the iPhone 16 with flat sides and a sleek in-hand feel. But unlike the iPhone’s Ceramic Shield, Vivo uses Schott Sensation Core, which holds up better against scratches. It also carries a more modern IP69 rating (vs iPhone’s IP68), giving it an edge in ruggedness.
Feature
Vivo X200 FE
iPhone 16
Display Glass
Schott Sensation Core
Ceramic Shield 2.0
Water Resistance
IP69
IP68
Weight
< 200g
Lighter
Extra Buttons
—
Action + Camera Button
In-box Accessories
Case + Charger Included
None
Battery & Charging: Vivo Leads the Pack
The X200 FE wins hands down in this department. With a larger battery and 90W fast charging, it offers up to 8 hours of screen-on time. In contrast, the iPhone 16 maxes out around 6.5 hours and takes over 90 minutes to charge.
This is where the gap widens. The iPhone 16, in 2025, still uses a 60Hz OLED panel, while Vivo equips the X200 FE with a 120Hz LTPO AMOLED, 3000 nits peak brightness, and 2160Hz PWM dimming for better eye comfort.
Feature
Vivo X200 FE
iPhone 16
Size
6.31”
6.1”
Refresh Rate
120Hz LTPO
60Hz
Peak Brightness
3000 nits
Brighter outdoors
HDR Support
HDR10+
Dolby Vision
PWM Dimming
2160Hz
Not specified
Audio & Haptics: iPhone Still Wins
While the X200 FE offers stereo speakers and high-res Bluetooth codecs (LDAC, LHDC), the iPhone 16’s speakers sound fuller, and its haptic feedback remains unmatched thanks to Apple’s Haptic Engine.
Vivo X200 FE vs iPhone 16
Performance & Storage
iPhone 16: Powered by the A18 chip, leading in CPU benchmarks
Vivo X200 FE: Runs on MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, excellent GPU stability, and better thermal management
What’s more impressive is that Vivo offers 12GB RAM and 256GB base storage, whereas iPhone sticks to 8GB RAM and 128GB in the base variant.
Gaming Comparison
BGMI: iPhone capped at 60FPS due to display
Vivo X200 FE: Supports 120FPS gameplay, cooler surface temps, and more consistent frame rates in Genshin Impact
However, the iPhone supports console-level games like Resident Evil Village and Assassin’s Creed Mirage via App Store, which Android lacks.
Camera Showdown: More Versatile on Vivo
Vivo features a triple-camera system, including a dedicated telephoto lens, while iPhone sticks to a dual-lens setup.
Advertisement
Camera Feature
Vivo X200 FE
iPhone 16
Main Sensor
50MP + Zeiss Color Modes
24MP
Zoom Capabilities
3x Optical, 10x Digital
2x In-Sensor Crop
Low-Light Performance
Better Brightness & Detail
More Neutral Look
Ultrawide Camera
8MP
12MP + Macro Mode
Selfie Camera
Great in low light
Better color accuracy
Video Quality
4K60 (Main + Front)
4K60 + HDR Support
Verdict: Vivo wins in photography; iPhone dominates in videography.
Software: Apple Ecosystem Still Reigns
iPhone 16 runs iOS 18 / iOS 26 Developer Beta
Vivo X200 FE runs FunTouch OS 15 (Android 15)
While Vivo promises 4 years of updates, Apple is expected to deliver 6–7 years. iOS still offers a more refined UI, better app support, and exclusive ecosystem features like MagSafe, Dynamic Island, and Apple Intelligence (AI suite).
AI Features Compared
AI Features
Vivo X200 FE
iPhone 16
AI Editing
AI Eraser, Live Cutout, Photo Enhance
Image Playground, Genmoji
Assistant
Google Gemini, Circle to Search
Apple Intelligence
Translation
AI Call Translator
Visual Lookup, Siri Smart Tasks
Final Verdict: Is Vivo X200 FE the Better Deal?
If you care about:
Hardware value
High refresh rate display
Photography versatility
Faster charging & better battery life
Lower price (₹49,999 vs iPhone’s ₹79,990)
Then the Vivo X200 FE is the better buy. However, if you want unmatched software experience, ecosystem integration, and best-in-class video, the iPhone 16 still wins in refinement.